HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9444 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. Heard Sri Sachin Upadhyay, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri P.K. Pandey, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and Sri Ankit Srivastava, the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. By means of the instant writ petition the petitioner has challenged the validity of an order dated 25.07.2025, passed in Revision No.4354/77-4-24/114Appeal/23: M/s Atma Ram Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority by opposite party no.1 under Section 41(3) of U.P. Urban Development and Planning Act, 1973. At the outset the learned counsel for the petitioner states that some defects have crept in the petition for which reason he does not want to press the writ petition and it may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. October 8, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sachin Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority Thr.Authorized Signatory,Pramod Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt.Infrastructure Industrial Development Govt. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench