Research › Search › Judgment
Madras High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 199880 (MAD)
Murugesan v. The State Rep. by
CRL OP/30250/2025 · 2025-11-18
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199880 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199880 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 30250 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18-11-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 30250 of 2025 Murugesan Petitioner(s)/A2 Vs The State Represented by its, The Inspector of Police Rasipuram Police Station Namakkal District Crime No. 649 of 2023. Respondent(s) PRAYER : To enlarge the petitioner on bail pending investigation in Spl.C.C.No. 69 of 2024 on the file of Additional District Judge and Presiding Officer Special Court under EC Act, Salem. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Deepakkumar For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 30250 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 12.12.2023 for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c) & 20(b) (ii)©, 25, 29(1) of NDPS Act, in Spl.C.C.No. 69 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. This Court while dismissed the bail application in Crl.O.P.Nos. 17906 and 18303 of 2025, dated 14.10.2025 has observed as follows:-
“6. Considering the fact that the trial is almost concluded and the petitioners are the main accused, who were travelled in a car and while they were travelling the contraband was recovered, this Court is of the view that granting bail at this stage would hamper the trial process and also the petitioners have not satisfied the twin conditions as contemplated under Section 37 of NDPS Act. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners”. 3.By relying the bail order passed in the month of April, 2025, this second bail petition has been filed. It is made clear that this petition is abuse of process of law, and I am not inclined to entertain in this petition. Hence, this petition is dismissed. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 30250 of 2025
4. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 18.11.2025 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking order MSM To
1. The State Represented by its, The Inspector of Police Rasipuram Police Station Namakkal District Crime No. 649 of 2023.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 30250 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR
, J.
MSM CRL OP No. 30250 of 2025 18.11.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis