ROHIT MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO
BAIL/2125/2025 · 2025-10-08
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199868 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199868 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2125 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.137 of 2024, under Sections 85 and 80 of BNS and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Shivratan Ganj, District Amethi.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the applicant before the this Court is the husband. It is argued that the co accused Komal Shukla and Smt Sushila Mishra were enlarged on bail vide orders dated 24.1.2025 and 17.2.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 734 of 2025 and Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 1437 of 2025 respectively, copies of which are annexures 6 and 7 to the bail application .
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the fact that the postmortem report indicate the cause of death as ante mortem injury, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in custody since 29.11.2024 and have no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Rohit Mishra be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Durgesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rohit Mishra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 8, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 2125 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench