Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199860 (ALL)

AMREESH GIRI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.

BAIL/5939/2025 · 2025-10-08

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5939 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Rejoinder affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.5 of 2025, under Sections 318(4), 111, 316 (5) BNS and Section 66(D) of the I.T. Act, P.S. Bazar Shukul, District Amethi. 3. It is argued that the co accused Aditya, Shiv Pujan Yadav and Sirtaj @ Sirtaj Ahmad with the similar allegations have been enlarged on bail vide orders dated 7.7.2025, 17.6.2025 and 11.6.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No.5654 of 2025, Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 5356 of 2025 and Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 5198 of 2025 respectively. The applicant's criminal history has been duly explained in paragraph 15 of the application. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that the co accused with similar allegations have been enlarged on bail, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Amreesh Giri be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravindra Shukla, Vinay Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amreesh Giri .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 8, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 5939 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench