HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 2009 of 2024 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Aakash Prasad, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rahul Shukla, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Arvind Pratap Singh, the learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2. 2. By means of the instant writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought quashing of an order passed in execution proceedings instituted for executing of an exparte award dated 23.08.2023 passed by the Labour Court, Ayodhya in Case No. 12/2012. 3. The exparte award has been set aside by means of a separate judgment and order passed today in Writ C No. 9142 of 2025 and, therefore, the present writ petition challenging validity of proceedings for execution of the exparte award dated 23.08.2023 has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aakash Prasad, Amitav Singh, Himanshu Singh, Yash Joshi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Arvind Pratap Singh Hindustan Unilever Ltd. Mumbai, Thru. Its Authorized Signatory .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Labour, Lucknow And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. The amount deposited in this Court in furtherance of the order dated 28.02.2024 be refunded to the petitioner. October 8, 2025 Pradeep/- WRIC No. 2009 of 2024 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench