GOKARAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME,CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/8815/2025 · 2025-10-08
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199847 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199847 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8815 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
1. Heard Shri Arvind,Advocate holding brief of Sri Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State.
2. On an objection raised by learned AGA that in regard to the prayer made in this petition, the petitioner has an alternative and statutory remedy under Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, which may be availed by the petitioner in accordance with law, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy as may be available under law. To which there is no objection by learned AGA.
3. In view of above, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid.
October 8, 2025 Akanksha Sri/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar, Keshav Ram Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Gokaran .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home,Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench