HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8774 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Shri D.D. Chopra, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Sanyam Agarwal, Shri Kunal Veer Chopra as well as Ms. Chandni Bhatia, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.3. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in considering the representation dated August 14, 2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Upon consideration of the facts and circumstances and upon hearing learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, we are of the view that the respondent No.3 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, the respondent No. 3/General Manager (Transmission Line), Lucknow is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 5. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 8, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Virech Shakti Pandey, Akash Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Neerav Chitravanshi, Shailesh Verma (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Savitri Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Energy Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench