HARISHCHANDRA PATHAK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. FINANCE DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/9563/2025 · 2025-10-08
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199827 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199827 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9563 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri D.K. Srivastava, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri S.K. Khare, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and Sri Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties no.3 and 4.
2. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for the following main relief:
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing the letter no.447 dated 26.08.2025 in general meeting dated 21.08.2025 in termination of the petitioner in the members of trust and member of Kshetriya Sri Gandhi Ashram, Akbarpur, Ambedkar Nagar, contained as Annexure No.1 to this writ petition."
3. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum as may be available under law, to which the learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection.
4. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty as aforesaid. October 8, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sanjay Kumar Srivastava (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Harishchandra Pathak .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Finance Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench