SMT. TARAWATI v. COMMISSIONER, DEVI PATAN MANDAL,GONDA AND OTHERS
A227/6033/2025 · 2025-10-08
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199826 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199826 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6033 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondent1 No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents is dispensed with. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the Revision No.00299 of 2018 (Computerized Case no.C201808000000299) filed under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No.1. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to furnish an undertaking that the petitioner will not seek any unnecessary adjournment and in case of a date when the members of Bar are abstaining from work, the petitioner shall appear in person to make her submissions. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Revision No.00299 of 2018 (Computerized Case no.C201808000000299) filed under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 most expeditiously, affording full Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Govind Kumar Chourasia Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Tarawati .....Petitioner(s) Commissioner, Devi Patan Mandal,Gonda And Others .....Respondent(s)
opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably within a period of six months from the date an authenticated copy of this order is placed before the authority concerned. The petitioner shall also furnish an undertaking, as mentioned above, along with a copy of this order. In case, if the petitioner does not furnish the aforesaid undertaking, then the petitioner shall not be entitled to the benefit of this order. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.
October 8, 2025 Harshita A227 No. 6033 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench