VIVEK KUMAR TRIVEDI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
BAIL/9279/2025 · 2025-10-08
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199825 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199825 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9279 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.98 of 2025, under Section 80(2), 85, 125, 324(4), 391(2) BNS & Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, P.S. Sareni, District Rae Bareli.
3. The FIR in question was lodged alleging that daughter of the informant was married to the applicant and subsequently, it was alleged that daughter was killed by poisoning. The postmortem on record does not indicate any injury. The viscera which was sent for examination has not come so far.
4. It also appears from record that the co-accused i.e. father-in-law was enlarged on bail vide order dated 12.09.2025.
5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the postmortem report and there being prima-facie no allegation that soon before the death the victim was subjected to any mental or physical harassment which can be the cause of death, a case for bail is made out, particularly, when the applicant has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 08.06.2025. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant Vivek Kumar Trivedi be released on bail in aforesaid Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudhir Kumar Rai, Devesh Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vivek Kumar Trivedi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 8, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 9279 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench