Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19980 (ALL)

SMT. LALATI DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/5533/2025 · 2025-04-08

Shekhar B Saraf, Y K Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:51355-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5533 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Lalati Devi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Kumar Pandey,Shyamdhar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Satish Chaturvedi Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Upon perusal of the record, it is clear that notice under Section 13(4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 has been issued by the bank authorities. 2. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is submitting that payments have been made by him and in spite of the same the account has been made into an non-performing asset. 3. In our view, this matter is not maintainable before the writ court and the petitioners having an alternative remedy of approaching the Debt Recovery Tribunal, are required to be relegated to the same. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal for redressal of their grievances. If an application is moved within two weeks from date before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, the Debt Recovery Tribunal is directed to expeditiously hear the matter of the petitioners. Order Date :- 9.4.2025 Radhika (Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad