RAJVEER KASHYAP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/140/2025 · 2025-10-15
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199773 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199773 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 140 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.334 of 2024, under Section 137(2), 87, 64 BNS & Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, P.S. Pali, District Hardoi.
3. In terms of the FIR it was alleged that daughter of the informant was enticed by the applicant. Subsequently, in the two statements, the victim did not support the prosecution and stated that both of them have married. Tentative age of the victim is around 13 years, although, there is no definite document with regard to the exact age of the victim.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the two statements, the applicant, who is in custody since 17.09.2024 and has no criminal antecedent, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Rajveer Kashyap be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Deepansi, Deepansi, Divya, Lalla Chauhan, Mangal Sen Yadav, Sandhya Devi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajveer Kashyap .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 15, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 140 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench