Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19977 (CHH)

KHULESHWARI SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2727/2021 · 2025-09-08

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:45896 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2727 of 2021 * - Khuleshwari Singh W/o Brijesh Singh Aged About 34 Years Secretary, Gram Panchayat Lohari And Tendumuda, Tahsil Marwahi , District Gourella Pendra Marwahi Chhattisgarh, R/o Village Tikthti, Tahsil Marwahi , Gourella Pendra Marwahi Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development , Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya , Nawa Raipur , Atal Nagar , District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector District Gourella Pendra Marwahi Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (R) Marwahi , District Gourella Pendra Marwahi Chhattisgarh. 4 - Zila Panchayat (DRDA) District Gourella Pendra Marwahi Through Its DRDA, District Gourella Pendra Marwahi Chhattisgarh. 5 - Janpad Panchayat Marwahi District Gourella Pendra Marwahi Chhattisgarh Through Its Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Marwahi , District Gourella Pendra Marwahi Chhattisgarh. 6 - Pratap Singh Maravi President Janpad Panchayat Marwahi , District Gourella Pendra Marwahi Chhattisgarh. 7 - Gram Panchayat Lohari District Gourella Pendra Marwahi Through Its Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Lohari , Tahsil Marwahi District Gourella Pendra Marwahi Chhattisgarh. 8 - Gram Panchayat Tendumunda District Gourella Pendra Marwahi Chhattisgarh Through Its Sarpancha Gram Panchayat Tendumunda, Tahsil Marwahi , District Gourella Pendra Marwahi Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Annu Mishra, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Malay Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 3 For Respondent No. 5 : : Mr. Vedant Shadangi, Panel Lawyer Mr. Dhiraj Wankhede, Advocate Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2025.09.10 14:13:18 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 09/09/2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous, therefore, this petition may be dismissed being rendered infructuous. 2. No objection from other side. 3. Recording the statement made by Ms. Annu Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti