Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199765 (ALL)

PRADEEP KAUSHAL v. SRI ANAND PRAKASH RAI, NAIB TEHSILDAR, MILKIPUR, DISTRICT AYODHYA

CAPL/3875/2024 · 2025-10-08

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3875 of 2024 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. Case has been called in the revised list. 2. This case has been listed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Allahabad High Court Rules. 3. Shri Prabhakar Tiwari, learned counsel for respondent has submitted that the judgment and order of the Writ Court has been complied with. 4. Neither the learned counsel for applicant is present nor any request has been made on his behalf for adjournment of the case or file the steps. 5. The contempt application is dismissed for want of prosecution. 6. Notice, if any, issued to the respondent, stands discharged. October 8, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Prabhakar Tiwari (Manish Kumar,J.) Pradeep Kaushal .....Applicant(s) Sri Anand Prakash Rai, Naib Tehsildar, Milkipur, District Ayodhya .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench