MUKESH YADAVA v. CANARA BANK THRU. CIRCLE OFFICE AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/4656/2024 · 2025-10-08
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199764 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199764 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 4656 of 2024 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Sri Santosh Kr. Yadav Warsi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file afresh as there is certain discrepancies in the pleading of the writ petition.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection to the submission aforesaid.
3. In view of the aforesaid submission, instant petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh.
4. Office is directed to return the certified copy of the orders/records, if any, to the counsel for the petitioner. October 8, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kr. Yadav Warsi, Rati Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Vinay Shankar (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Mukesh Yadava .....Petitioner(s) Canara Bank Thru. Circle Office And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench