Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199761 (ALL)

RISHABH VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/12850/2024 · 2025-10-08

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12850 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.430 of 2024, under Section 137(2), 115(2), 87, 352, 351(2), 127(2), 64 of BNS and Section 5/6 POCSO Act and Section 3(1)(da)(dha), 3(2)(va), 3(2)5 of SC/ST, Police Station Kotwali Akbarpur, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3. Both the Counsel for the applicant states that the victim and the applicant have married. The FIR in question was lodged as a missing person report. 4. In view of the statement of both the counsel that the applicant and the victim have married and staying together coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 05.09.2024, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant Rishabh Verma be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vishal Kumar Yadav, Prabhat, Ram Suphal, Suresh Kumar Pandey, Vinay Kumar Dubey, Vishal Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Adarsh Pratap Singh, Mohd. Hanzala, Surjeet Kumar Mishra Rishabh Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 8, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 12850 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench