SONU YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/6462/2025 · 2025-10-27
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199741 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199741 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6462 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 48 of 2024, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506, 302, 34 IPC, P.S. Bakshi Ka Talab, District Lucknow.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the applicant was not named in the FIR. Subsequently he was linked with the offence based upon the statement. He further argues that the co accsued who was named in the FIR was enlarged on bail vide order dated 1.7.2024 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No 7030 of 2024. It is further argued that the main role of firing was not assigned to the applicant. It is lastly argued that the applicant has no criminal history and is in jail since 29.2.2025.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering and adopting the reasoning as contained in paragraphs 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the bail order dated 1.7.2024, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 29.2.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Sonu Yadav be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sonu Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 27, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 6462 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench