AKHTAR ALI v. SRI P.K. PATNAYAK CHAIRMAN ARYAVARAT GRAMIN BANK
CAPL/2935/2012 · 2025-10-08
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199736 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199736 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2935 of 2012 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
1. Case has been called in the revised list.
2. Neither the learned counsels for the applicant are present nor any request has been made on their behalf for adjournment of the case whereas Shri Atul Chaturvedi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Lalit Shukla, learned counsel for respondent is present.
3. The contempt application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Notice, if any, issued to the respondent, stands discharged. October 8, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : A.P. Singh, Amarendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Lalit Shukla (Manish Kumar,J.) Akhtar Ali .....Applicant(s) Sri P.K. Patnayak Chairman Aryavarat Gramin Bank .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench