RAJENDRA PRASAD YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU.ITS PRIN. SECY./ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. AND 5 OTHERS
WPIL/1192/2025 · 2025-11-21
Arun Bhansali, Jaspreet Singh
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199715 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199715 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1192 of 2025 Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner requiring the respondents to make alternative arrangement for removing water logging created by respondent no. 6 by making interruption in flowing drainage/sewage of Village Panchayat Faridpur Saifan, Pargana Bidhar, Tehsil Tanda, District Ambedkar Nagar.
2. A perusal of the petition indicates that respondent no. 6 has filed Writ- B No.832 of 2025, wherein an order for maintaining status-quo has been passed.
3. Seeking directions, as prayed in the petition, would essentially affect the said status quo order granted in the writ petition filed by respondent no. 6.
4. In view of the above, the PIL filed by the petitioner cannot be entertained. The petitioner would be free to seek vacation of the interim order granted in Writ-B No.832 of 2025 pending before this Court by seeking impleadment/intervention.
5. With the above observations, the petition stands disposed of. November 21, 2025 Rakesh/SL Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lalendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Tushar Verma (A.C.S.C.), Mohan Singh (Jaspreet Singh,J.) (Arun Bhansali,CJ.) Rajendra Prasad Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. through its Prin. Secy./Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. and 5 others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench