HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6826 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to respondent no. 3 to decide the application dated 23.01.2025 pending in case no. 3471 / 2017 (Suremna Vs. Chauthiram) under Section 33(1) of U.P. Revenue Code, for mutating the name of the petitioner in the revenue records. 3. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand has submitted that there is no provision for entertaining an application of the nature filed by the petitioner inasmuch as the case was allowed relying upon the contents of the application preferred by the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, in these circumstances, no such direction as sought by the petitioner can be allowed and this Court would not vest a power in the authorities which is otherwise not vested in him in accordance with law. 5. In view of above, the writ petition stands dismissed. November 21, 2025 Ravi/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Maneesh Singh, Hanumant Lal Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Suremna Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Irrigation Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench