DEEPAK MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/1367/2025 · 2025-12-11
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199707 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199707 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1367 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.812 of 2020, under Sections 498A, 304B, 504 IPC and Section 3/4 D. P. Act, P.S. Kotwali Sadar, District Lakhimpur Kheri.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that two of the co accused Santosh Kumar Shukla and Rekha Dixit with similar allegations have been enlarged on bail vide orders dated 21.11.2025 and 10.12.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. No. 1284 of 2025 and 1364 of 2025 respectively.
4. It is argued that sister in law was granted anticipatory bail in Criminal Misc Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. No. 1364 of 2025. The applicant is brother in law.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances and adopting the same reasoning the applicant Deepak Mishra is enlarged on anticipatory bail on same terms and conditions as of sister in law. In view thereof, the application is allowed. December 11, 2025 J. K. Dinkar Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aman Kumar Shrivastav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Deepak Mishra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench