Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199705 (ALL)

RAM KRISHNA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

/10295/2025 · 2025-12-08

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10295 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Sri Mukesh Kumar Tewari, Advocate, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 & 3, has filed an affidavit on their behalf, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3. 3. The applicant has filed this application with the prayer to quash the Charge sheet no. 01 dated 1.1.2025 under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 506, and section 447 I.P.C, Police station Indira Nagar, District Lucknow, filed in pursuance of the First Information Report dated 8.5.2024 bearing its Case Crime No. 122 of 2024 under section 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C, as well as the impugned cognizance order dated 1.9.2025 passed by the learned court below in warrant case no. 85543/25, State of U.P versus Ram Krishna Singh and others, on the basis of compromise/ consent deed held between the parties, contained as Annexure Nos. 1 and 2 to the application. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as ANNEXURE NO. 7 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vijay Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mukesh Kumar Tewari Ram Krishna Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the parties concerned to appear before the trial court concerned within 2 weeks from today alongwith original compromise and the trial court is directed to verify the compromise within next 6 weeks. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if it has been filed, to the learned counsel for the applicant, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 8, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 10295 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench