[2025:RJ-JP:29118] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6819/2025 1. Prakash Mahala @ Lala S/o Shri Ramgopal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Basada Meharan, Police Station Gandhinagar, District Ajmer. (Presently Confined In Central Jail At Ajmer). 2. Ramsawroop Jat @ Bhura S/o Shri Motiram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Sursura, Police Station Roopangarh, District Ajmer. (Presently Confined In Central Jail At Ajmer). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6838/2025 Mukesh Jat @ Madhu S/o Shri Bhagchand, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Chhoti Dhani Ramner Dhani, Police Station Gandhinagar, District Ajmer. (Presently Confined In Central Jail At Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narsi Prasad Sharma Ms. Nikitha Bhandari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 31/07/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.59/2025 registered at Police [2025:RJ-JP:29118] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6819/2025] Station Madanganj, District-Ajmer for offences under Section 308(4) of BNS. 2. Since both the bail applications have arisen from common order, hence, they are being decided by this single order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. As per the charge-sheet, allegations against the present petitioners are to raise the demand of rupees ten lakh for the purpose of extortion. Petitioners are behind the bars since 06.04.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence on the ground of parity, the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Prakash Mahala @ Lala S/o Shri Ramgopal, Ramsawroop Jat @ Bhura S/o Shri Motiram and Mukesh Jat @ Madhu S/o Shri Bhagchand shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the [2025:RJ-JP:29118] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6819/2025] satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/146-147