SUSHEEL v. STATE OF U.P.PRIN. SECY. DEPT.OF PUBLIC WORK AND 2 ORS.
WPIL/27016/2018 · 2025-10-10
Rajan Roy, Rajeev Bharti
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199689 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199689 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 27016 of 2018 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. C.M.A. No.110014 of 2018 (Application for Amendment)
1. Having gone through the affidavit filed in support of application seeking amendment in the prayer clause, cause shown is sufficient. Accordingly, the application is allowed.
2. Let the office carry out the amendment in the memo of petition. Order on Petition
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner who had filed the PIL is not present.
4. The relief sought is to issue a mandamus to the opposite parties to get an electronic display or any display affixed to show the controlled area prescribed under U.P. Roadside Land Control Act, 1945 for each and every road in the State of U.P.
5. The petitioner may move an application before the opposite no.1, i.e. the ACS/Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Government of U.P. Lucknow, who may consider the said request and do the needful as per law expeditiously.
6. Disposed of. October 10, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Madan Gopal Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Susheel .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Prin. Secy. Dept.Of Public Work And 2 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench