- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:10241 WP No. 6938 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 6938 OF 2025 (LB-TAX) BETWEEN: 1. ISHETA REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1956, HAVING OFFICE AT JOLLY MAKERS CHAMBERS II, 15TH FLOOR, NARIMAN POINT MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA - 400 021 ALSO AT: SALGAOCAR CENTRE, E4, MURGAON ESTATE, OFF AIRPORT ROAD, CHICALIM, GOA - 403 711 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, MR RICHARD SOARES MANAGER - LEGAL … PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANU P. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE HUDSON CIRCLE, N R SQUARE, BENGALURU, Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:10241 WP No. 6938 of 2025 KARNATAKA - 560 002 REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER 2. REVENUE OFFICER OFFICE OF REVENUE OFFICER (SHANTHINAGAR), BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, 12TH FLOOR, P U BUILDING, M G ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MILIND DANGE, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE i.e., FORM OF PROCLAMATION AND WRITTEN NOTICE DATED 27.02.2025 BEARING NO.RO(SN)/PR//2024-25 (ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER The present petition has been filed calling in question the correctness of the proclamation and written notice of sale of immovable property at Annexure-A. 2. It is noticed that the demand raised in terms of Annexure-A is Rs.1,21,641/-. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:10241 WP No. 6938 of 2025 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said amount has been paid. He further submits that the correctness of calculation at Annexure-A ought to be kept open for necessary consideration by respondent - BBMP. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent - BBMP submits that the demand raised at Annexure-A has been satisfied. 5. The present dispute relates to the proceedings initiated at Annexure-A. In light of tax liability having been satisfied, the written notice of sale of immovable property would not be in operation any more insofar as the subject matter of demand at Annexure-A. Any consequential proceedings pursuant to Annexure-A also cannot be proceeded with. Needless to state if there is any calculation error, it is open for the petitioner to make a representation to the respondent - BBMP to look into the same. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:10241 WP No. 6938 of 2025 6. Accordingly, petition is disposed off as not calling for any adjudication, taking note of the subsequent events. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP