Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199663 (MAD)

SENTHILKUMAR v. The State rep by Through the Inspector of Police

CRL OP/33814/2025 · 2025-12-10

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 33814 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-12-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 33814 of 2025 1. SENTHILKUMAR S/o. Dhamotharasamy, No.4/12, Muthaiyar Street, Pattanam, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State rep by Through the Inspector of Police Sulur Police Station,. Coimbatore District. Crime No.1063/2025. Respondent(s) CRL OP No. 33814 of 2025 PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Crime No.1063 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. CRL OP No. 33814 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): R.Prabakar P. Marudhupandian https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 33814 of 2025 S. Selvi S.Senthil Kumaran S. Ranjith Kumaran M. Saradadevi S. Vignesh For Respondent(s): Mr.A. Gopinath, Govt Advocate ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 20.11.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 4(1) ( c) of TNP Act and Section 77 of JJ Act in Crime No.1063 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 70 numbers of liquor bottles. Hence, this case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 33814 of 2025 submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and sought for bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent while opposing the bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case. He further submitted that the petitioner is habitual offender and there are 28 previous cases pending against him. 5.Considering the facts of the case and the bad antecedent of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 10-12-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 33814 of 2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To. 1. The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore 2. The Inspector of Police, Sulur Police Station,. Coimbatore District. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 33814 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 33814 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR J. smn CRL OP No. 33814 of 2025 10-12-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis