MUKESH KUMAR PASWAN v. CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR MS B C C L AND ORS
WPC/7813/2012 · 2025-04-23
Deepak Roshan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19966 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19966 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:12335 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(S) No. 7813 of 2012
---- Mukesh Kumar Paswan son of Late Nandkeshwar Ram, resident of Maszid Mohallah, Putki, P.O. & P.S. Putki, District Dhanbad, presently working as Mining Sardar, Dhansar Colliery, Kusunda Area, M/s. B.C.C.L., Dhanbad.
....Petitioner.
Versus
1. Chairman-cum-Managing Director, M/s. B.C.C.L., Koyla Bhawan, Koyla Nagar, P.O. Koyla Nagar, P.S. Saraidhela, District Dhanbad.
2. Director Personnel, Headquarter M/s. B.C.C.L. Koyla Bhawan, Koyla Nagar, P.O. Koyla Nagar, P.S. Saraidhela, District Dhanbad.
3. General Manager, Kusunda Area (Area-VI), M/s. B.C.C.L.. P.O. Kusunda, P.S. Kenduadih, District Dhanbad.
4. Deputy Chief Personnel Manager, Kusunda Area (Area- VI), M/S. B.C.C.L., P.O. Kusunda, P.S. Kenduadih, District Dhanbad.
5. Project Officer, Dhansar Colliery, Kusunda Area, M/s. B.C.C.L., P.O. Kusunda, P.S. Kenduadih, District Dhanbad.
...Respondents.
--
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
-- For the Petitioner : Mr. P. K. Mukhopadhyay, Advocate
For the Resp.-BCCL : M/s. Amit Kumar Das, Manmohit Bhalla, Sankalp Goswami, Advocates
-- 08/23.04.2025
Heard learned counsel for the parties
2.
The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying for a direction upon the respondent authorities to pay the admitted dues of L.T.C/L.L.T.C amounting to Rs. 32,730/- for the period from the year 2000 onwards, which has been illegally held- up without any rhyme and reason.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the admitted dues of L.T.C/L.L.T.C which is a very meagre amount, but the petitioner has not received the same in spite of the fact that he has represented the concerned respondent for payment of the same.
2025:JHHC:12335 2
4.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the instant writ application may be disposed of by directing the respondent no. 5 to decide the issue.
5.
Having regard to the aforesaid submission and looking to the averments made in the instant writ petition, the same is hereby disposed of by directing the 5th Respondent to consider this writ petition as representation and take a decision in the matter with regard to payment of L.T.C/L.L.T.C to the tune of Rs. 32,730/- in accordance with law and applicable Rules and Regulations by passing a reasoned order within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and any admitted amount, which would find to be payable; the same shall be paid to the Petitioner within a further period of 2 weeks. The petitioner is directed to serve a copy of this writ petition along with its order to 5th Respondent at the earliest.
6.
With the aforesaid observations/directions, this writ petition stands disposed of.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
jk