Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19965 (KAR)

K.K. MANJUNATH, v. SMT. AMRUTHA.M.

CRL.P/3250/2025 · 2025-03-27

Hemant Chandangoudar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:13441 CRL.P No. 3250 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3250 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. K.K. MANJUNATH, S/O KUBERAPPA., AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, STAFF NURSE. KIDWAI MEMORIAL INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY. DR.M.H. MARIGOWDA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 029. PERMANENT R/AT KOGANOOR VILLAGE KASABA, DAVANAGERE TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 003 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S RAJASHEKAR., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. AMRUTHA M W/O K.K. MANJUNATH, D/O K.K.MARUTHI, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/A KOLLAL VILLAGE. HOLALKERE TALUK PRESENTLY R/AT C/O K.K. OBALAPPA, VAIBHAVA NILAYA, DORESWAMY LAYOUT, KENCHANA KATTE, BADAVANE, CHITRADURGA TOWN, CHITRADURGA TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 501 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAHUL R, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 08.01.2025 PASSED ON AN APPLICATION FILED U/S 91 OF CR.P.C. IN CRL.MISC.NO.1226/2023 ON THE FILE OF I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT CHITRADURGA. Digitally signed by R HEMALATHA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:13441 CRL.P No. 3250 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR ORAL ORDER The petitioner challenges the order passed by the Trial Court, wherein, the application under Section 91 of Cr.P.C., came to be allowed, and the respondent has filed a petition under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. seeking maintenance from the petitioner. 2. In the said proceedings, the wife filed an application under Section 91 of Cr.P.C., directing the petitioner-husband to produce the salary certificate. The Trial Court, in order to adjudicate upon the quantum of maintenance to which the respondent-complainant is entitled to, had passed the impunged order directing the Officer concerned to furnish the salary certificate of the petitioner. 3. I do not find any illegality in the impugned order passed by the learned Trial Court. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE HR