Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199644 (ALL)

ACCHE LAL MAURYA v. THE COURT OF TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL JALALPUR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND ANOTHER

A227/7462/2025 · 2025-12-19

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7462 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Alok Kirti Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Jalalpur, District - Ambedkar Nagar to decide Case No. 00873 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. T 202104040200873) - Acche Lal Vs. Bhagwan Das, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Jalalpur, District - Ambedkar Nagar, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Jalalpur, District - Ambedkar Nagar, is directed to decide Case No. 00873 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. T 202104040200873) - Acche Lal Vs. Bhagwan Das, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Kirti Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Acche Lal Maurya .....Petitioner(s) The Court Of Tehsildar, Tehsil Jalalpur, Ambedkar Nagar And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench