IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No. 857 of 2024 Date of Decision: 9th April, 2025 Anurag Sharma ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner : Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate. For Respondent Nos. 1 and 2/ State : Mr. Prashant Sen, Deputy Advocate General. Respondent No.3 is proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 23.10.2024. Rakesh Kainthla,Judge (Oral) Report has been received from the learned Trial Court that efforts will be made to dispose of the case within a period of three months. 2. In view of this report, learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the present petition; hence, the present petition is disposed of as not pressed. 3. It is sincerely hoped that the learned Trial Court will adhere to the time line given by it in disposal of the case. 4. A copy of this order be sent to learned Trial Court for information. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 9th April, 2025 (saurav pathania)