APHC010279732020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4397/2020 Between: 1. TANNERU CHINA MALAKONDAIAH, S/O. PEDA MALA KONDAIAH AGE. 52 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O RAJUPALEM, CHINA ANNALURU VILLAGE, KAVALI MANDAL, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, AMARAVATHI. 2. SRI P JANARDHAN RAO, TAHSILDAR, KALIGIRI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased to quash the proceedings in FIR.No.39 of 2018 dated 27.03.2018 on the file of the Kaligiri Police Station, SPSR Nellore District for the offence U/Sec.420, 468 and 471 of IPC and to grant such other relief or IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to Order dispense with the filing of the Certified Copy of the FIR.No.39 of 2018 dated 27.03.2018 on the file of the 2 Kaligiri Police Station, SPSR Nellore District and receive the Xerox copy of the same on record and pass such other Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. KANCHARLA PALLI SIVA RAMA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 3 The Court made the following: ORDER : The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed, by the Petitioner/accused, seeking quashment of the proceedings against him in FIR No.39 of 2018, on the file of the Kaligiri Police Station, SPSR Nellore District. 2. Heard Sri K.Siva Rama Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case and that there are no ingredients against the petitioner to attract the alleged offences. Learned counsel prays for quashment of the petition. 4. Ms. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, this criminal petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to conclude the investigation and file a report in accordance with law. The petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh petition in case anything goes against him. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 24-07-2025 MH 4 89 HON’BLE Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.4397 of 2020 Dt.24.07.2025 MH