HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9863 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated 04.08.2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.2 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No. 2/District Magistrate, Sultanpur is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. After the said reasoned order is passed and if the same is in favour of the petitioner, respondent No.4 is directed to act upon the same expeditiously and make Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prabhakar Pandey, Dinesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Budhna .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Revenue U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) payment of insurance amount to the petitioner in accordance with law. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 15, 2025 Ashutosh WRIC No. 9863 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench