RANJIT YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO.
BAIL/13345/2024 · 2025-10-16
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199627 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199627 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13345 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State.
2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.0196 of 2024 under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 123, 64 BNS and Section 3/4 of DP Act and Section 67 of IT Act, P.S.- Manikpur, District- Pratapgarh.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the victim, aged about 21 years, was married to the cousin brother of the applicant and sufficient dowry was also given in the marriage. Subsequently, the victim went with the applicant and he took her to a hotel where she was administered something, because of which, she became unconscious, thereafter, physical relations were made.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances and the age of victim i.e. 21 years coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 10.10.2024 and has no previous criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant- Ranjit Yadav be released on bail in aforesaid Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sumit Kumar Srivastava, Gyan Singh, Vyas Narayan Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ranjit Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
FIR/Case Crime Number subject to her furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 16, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 13345 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench