HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6520 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Vishram Kumar Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India prayer has been made for direction to respondent no. 1 - Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Faizabad Division, Faizabad (Now Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya), for expeditious disposal of Appeal No. 1976 of 2025 - Mohd. Ansar @ Ansar Ahmad Vs. Shakir Ali and Others, under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Faizabad Division, Faizabad (Now Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya), considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the Court concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of Appeal No. 1976 of 2025 - Mohd. Ansar @ Ansar Ahmad Vs. Shakir Ali and Others, under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the Court/Authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioner, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the Court concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. November 10, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vishram Kumar Chauhan, Mini Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajay Kumar Singh Raj (Alok Mathur,J.) Shakir Ali And Another .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Faizabad Division, Faizabad And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench