RAMESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/9158/2025 · 2025-11-21
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199611 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199611 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9158 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant for quashing the Charge sheet No. 248/2023, dated 03.12.2023 as well as summoning order dated 17.12.2024 in Crime No. 0262/2023, U/S-447, 504, 506, 427 IPC, in Crl. Case No.9687/2024 State V/s Ramesh Chandra and others pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Room No.20, Sultanpur and also quashing the entire proceeding of the court below pending before him. A certified copy of the charge sheet dated 03.12.2023 and summoning order dated 17.12.2024 is being annexed herewith as Annexure No.1 and 2 to this affidavit.
3. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicant may be permitted to move discharge application through counsel and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same.
4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.
5. In view of above, it is provided that applicant is permitted to move his discharge application(s) through counsel within four weeks from today and in case any such application(s) is/are being filed, same shall be heard Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Virendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramesh Chandra Tripathi And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties, in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order.
6. Till the aforesaid period of four weeks and during pendency of discharge application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.
7. In case of failure on the part of applicant in moving the discharge application(s) within the aforesaid period, he will not be entitled to the benefit of this order.
8. With above directions, this application stands disposed of. November 21, 2025 Anurag A482 No. 9158 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench