PRADEEP KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPTT. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WPIL/1161/2025 · 2025-11-15
Rajan Roy, Rajeev Bharti
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199607 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199607 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1161 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Heard.
2. The petitioner claims to have submitted a complaint against the Gram Pradhan. If the complaint has been submitted in accordance with the U.P. Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhan and Up-Pradhan and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997, then the District Magistrate may look into the matter and take such decision as is required in law but with expedition.
3. The petition is disposed of without making any observations on the merits of the case. November 15, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prem Chandra Chauhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Pradeep Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Deptt. Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench