2021 v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
BAILC/93/2023 of XYZ Complainant of Complaint no. 97 · 2025-11-15
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199604 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199604 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 93 of 2023 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Called out. No one appears for the applicant to press the bail cancellation application. Sri Shubham Singh appears for the accused opposite party no.2.
2. The present bail cancellation application has been filed seeking cancellation of bail granted to the accused on 27.06.2023.
3. Considering the fact that substantial time has elapsed and there being no material to suggest any good ground to cancel the bail at this stage, the bail cancellation application is rejected.
4. However, the trial court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously, if not concluded. November 15, 2025 VNP/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek Srivastava, Vinay Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shubham Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Xyz Complainant Of Complaint No. 97 Of 2021 .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench