Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199592 (ALL)

ABDUL HALIM AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 9 OTHERS

WRIC/10353/2025 · 2025-11-10

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10353 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Instructions provided by learned standing counsel is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 3. This writ petition has been filed by petitioners with the following main prayers:- "1. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS to the opposite parties not to disturb the peace full possession of petitioners Gata No-311 Kha in absence of any law full order / proceedings by any competent Court. 2. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding to the opposite parties not to harass the petitioners and also direct the opposite parties specially revenue and police authorities not to harass and threat the petitioners in an illegal manner, in the interest of justice" 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents submits that respondent authorities are not disturbing the peaceful possession of the petitioners at Gata No.311 (kha). However, the said contention of respondents is vehemently opposed by counsel appearing on behalf of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashant Shukla, Anjani Kumar Dvivedi, Krishna Kant Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Abdul Halim And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) petitioners who submits that the petitioners are being threatened on a daily basis by the police authorities and the Revenue Inspector. 5. In light of the above submissions, we are of the view that unless there is an order with respect to Gata No.311 (Kha), the official should not disturb the peaceful possession of the petitioners nor threaten them in any manner whatsoever. 6. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. November 10, 2025 Saurabh Yadav/- WRIC No. 10353 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench