[2025:RJ-JP:22558] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6830/2025 Santosh Shankar Rav Patil S/o Shri Shankar Lal Tataya Sahib Patil, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Mahanideshak Sahakarita Mishan, Address Nhq Icom Plot Number 110, Pocket 27, Sector 24, Rohini, New Delhi, At Present Resident Of C-201, Amit Bloom Ambe Gawn, Near Nawle Bridge, Pune, Police Station Bharti Vidhyapeeth Katraj, District Pune Maharashtra. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Malwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 28/05/2025 1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Santosh Shankar Rav Patil S/o Shri Shankar Lal Tataya Sahib Patil in FIR No.385/2022 dated 02.08.2022 registered at P.S. Vaishali Nagar, District – Jaipur (West), whereby the applicant- accused was charged under Sections 420,467, 468, 471, 406 and 120B IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is an innocent person and he was falsely implicated by police. He further submitted referred bail orders passed by a Co-ordinate Bench on different occasions in different cases registered against present petitioner and submitted that [2025:RJ-JP:22558] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6830/2025] facts of present case is identical with the cases, where bail is granted therefore petitioner is entitled to be released on bail. He also submitted that a similar nature of report was registered by police against petitioner and all of them requires consolidation. He also submitted that petitioner has not gained any financial benefit from the alleged act rather the role and involvement of preset petitioner was not proved from the material on record. He also submitted that the alleged offence is triable by a Magistrate of First Class. 3. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. He submitted a report along with case diary received from P.S. Vaishali Nagar, Dist. Jaipur (West). 4. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s)-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 5. On the basis of complaint filed by Ramveer Singh before learned ACJM No.1, Jaipur Metro-II, FIR No.385/2022 was registered at P.S. Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (West). During investigation, role and involvement of petitioner was investigated and after his involvement this petitioner was arrested, and presently the petitioner is in custody. 6. The record indicated that total 19 cases were registered against the petitioner and mostly at P.S. Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (West). Except 9 cases, the petitioner was already arrested in 10 cases. 7. Learned counsel for petitioner has submitted bail orders in FIR Nos. 361/2022, 362/2022, 364/2022, 351/2022, 384/2022, 363/2022 and 350/2022, all registered at P.S. [2025:RJ-JP:22558] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6830/2025] Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur West and bail order in FIR No.164/2021 at P.S. Surajpole, Udaipur. 8. We have gone through the bail orders passed by Co-ordinate Bench in aforesaid matters but after considering the judgment in case of State of U.P. Through C.B.I vs Amaramani Tripathi (2005) 8 SCC 21, I am of considered view that while considering the bail of any person, criminal background or criminal antecedents are essentially required to be considered. This was further reiterated and relied in the case of Anil Kumar Yadav Vs. State (NCT) of Delhi (2018) 12 SCC 129=AIR 2017 SC 5398. 9. Looking to criminal background and criminal antecedents as available on record, I am of considered view that this is not a fit case wherein petitioner be released on bail. 10. Thus, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS filed by Santosh Shankar Rav Patil is hereby dismissed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /293