1 2025:CGHC:31773 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2565 of 2025 1 - Smt. Chandarmati W/o Rajendra Singh Aged About 49 Years R/o Village -Katinda, Tehsil - Lakhanpur, Sarguja, District - Sarguja , Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Atal Nagar, Raipur District Raipur , Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Sarguja District - Sarguja, Chhattisgarh 3 - Tehsildar, Tehsil Udaypur Sarguja, District - Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saket Pandey, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Satish Gupta, G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 09/07/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly call for the records pertaining to case of the petitioner. 10.2 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly direct the respondent authorities to register the application dated 2 07.01.2025 preferred by the petitioner for mutation of her name in land records under Section 109 and 110 of C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and fit in facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has purchased the land which is situated at Village-Sontarai, P.H. No. 12, Tahsil, Udaypur, bearing Khasra No. 664/13, area 0.202 hectare way back on 18.06.2002 for consideration of Rs. 20,000/- through registered sale deed, however, the petitioner could not got mutated the said land in his name. Thereafter, on 7th January, 2025, the petitioner has moved an application before the Tahsildar, Udaypur, District- Sarguja, however, his application not registered by the then concerned Tahsildar and no orders have been passed. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submits that if the petitioner has moved an application, the concerned Tahsildar should have registered the case and should have initiated the proceedings upon the demarcation as per Section 109 and Section 110 of C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the Tahsildar-Udaypur, District- Sarguja is 3 directed to consider the said application, register the same and to proceed further in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders within a period of 45 days. Since the application has been filed way back on 7th January, 2025 as such the concerned Tahsildar is under obligation to register and decide the same in accordance with law. 6. With this observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima