RINA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. MEDICAL HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/15150/2025 · 2025-12-19
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199560 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199560 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15150 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Brijendra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos. 1 to 4, Mr. Vibhanshu Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent no. 6 and perused the record. Notice to respondent no. 5 is hereby dispensed with. Instant petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
"(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no.02 and 03 to allow to petitioner to work on the post of Security Guard in terms of order of appointment dated 16.05.2023 and grant the benefit of Para-3(3) of G.O. dated 18.12.2019 contained as ANNEXURE No.04 to this writ petition. (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no.04 to consider and decide representation dated 11.08.2025 as contained ANNEXURE No.06 to the writ petition. (iii) Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the circumstances of the case in favor of the petitioner. (iv) Allow the writ petition with cost." After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent no. 2 and he may be directed to consider & decide the same, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vibhanshu Srivastava Rina .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Medical Health And Family Welfare Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 15 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no. 2/Chief Medical Officer, Ayodhya, District Ayodhya, is hereby directed to consider and decide the same, within further period of eight weeks, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of.
December 19, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 15150 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench