Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199549 (ALL)

PRATIMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LUCKNOW AND ANOTHER

WRIC/10614/2025 · 2025-11-14

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10614 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the writ petitioner has sought for the following substantial reliefs:- "I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 05.11.2024, passed by O.P. No. 2, by which he/she has rejected the claim of the petitioner under Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatana Kalyan Yonjana. (Contained in Annexure No.1). II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the opposite parties to provide the benefits to the petitioner under the aforesaid scheme of 2020." 3. Upon hearing the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, it appears that the deceased owned agricultural land and was the breadwinner of the family. However, his claim has been rejected on the ground that apart from being a landowner, he was also running a medical shop. The impugned order, however, does not specify the proof or evidence regarding the operation of the medical shop by the petitioner. 4. In light of the same, the impugned order is quashed and set aside Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Tauseef Ali Ansari, Faizal Hashmi, K.K. Singh, Zoheb Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Pratima .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lucknow And Another .....Respondent(s) with a direction upon the authority to carry out a proper investigation, bring on record evidence in support of the petitioner running the medical shop, if any, grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, and thereafter, pass an order in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from date. 5. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. November 14, 2025 cks/- WRIC No. 10614 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench