Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19954 (GAU)

M/S DEEPAK CHETRY AND RDS AND 2 ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.

WP(C)/5765/2025 · 2025-09-25

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010220342025 2025:GAU-AS:13522 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5765/2025 M/S DEEPAK CHETRY AND RDS AND 2 ORS A JOINT VENTURE CONCERN AND REPRESENTED BY ITS LEAD PARTNER SRI DEEPAK CHETRY, S/O LATE BOM BAHADUR CHETRY, RESIDENT OF WARD NO.6, P.O. AND P.S.- NORTH LAKHIMPUR, DISTRICT - LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM. REGISTERED OFFICE AT GAKUL PATH, BYLANE NO.9, P.S.- DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM 2: DEEPAK CHETRY S/O LATE BOM BAHADUR CHETRY RESIDENT OF WARD NO.6 P.O. AND P.S.- NORTH LAKHIMPUR DISTRICT - LAKHIMPUR ASSAM 3: RANA DEV SAIKIA SON OF LATE GUNA KANTA SAIKIA RESIDENT OF WARD NO.7 P.O. AND P.S.- NORTH LAKHIMPUR DISTRICT - LAKHIMPUR ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, INDUSTRIES, COMMERCE AND PUBLIC ENTERPRISE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006 2:ASSAM INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED (AIDC) REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR R.G. BARUAH ROAD GUWAHATI-781024. 3:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED R.G. BARUAH ROAD GUWAHATI-781024. 4:M/S TRISHUL ASSOCIATES- M/S GANPATI ENTERPRISE JV GUWAHATI-781024 ASSAM. 5:PABITRA BORO GUWAHATI-781024 ASSAM. 6:RAJU MESH GUWAHATI-781024 ASSAM. (NOTICES ON THE RESPONDENT NO. 4 5 AND 6 MAY BE SERVED THROUGH THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 For the petitioner (s) : Mr. P. J. Saikia, Sr. Advocate Mr. K. Baruah, Advocate For the respondent (s) : Mr. S. R. Baruah, Govt. Advocate Mr. S. Das, SC, AIDC BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 26.09.2025 Heard Mr. P. J. Saikia, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. K. Baruah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. Mr. S. R. Baruah, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent No.1 and Mr. S. Dutta, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent Nos.2 & 3. 2. The petitioners herein are aggrieved by the rejection of the Page No.# 3/3 technical bid vide the communication dated 19.09.2025. 3. Mr. S. Das, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.2 & 3 has placed before this Court an instruction dated 26.09.2025 which is kept on record and marked with the letter “X”. 4. Taking into account the said instructions, Mr. P. J. Saikia, the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted upon being instructed by Mr. K. Baruah, the assisting counsel that the petitioners would be well advised to withdraw the instant writ petition. 5. Taking into account the above, the writ petition therefore stands closed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant