Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:29454] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6786/2025 Shahbdeen S/o Juhru Khan, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Naharpur, Police Station M.I.A., District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Raj., Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 01/08/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0060/2025 registered at Police Station-Shivaji Park, District-Alwar for offences under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of BNS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation against the present petitioner is of theft. He further submits that though there eighteen criminal cases are pending against the petitioner but in all of them, the petitioner is bailed out. He again submits that the petitioner is behind the Bars since 15.04.2025 and charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the
[2025:RJ-JP:29454] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6786/2025] petitioner in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Shahbdeen S/o Juhru Khan shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
7. Further, petitioner is directed to mark his presence fortnightly in every month before the SHO-Shivaji Park, District- Alwar till conclusion of trial.
8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case the petitioner fails to marks his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is
directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard.
9. If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the Court and the petitioner is found involved in similar
[2025:RJ-JP:29454] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6786/2025] nature of offence, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to the petitioner by this Court.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/169