NARENDRA NISHAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/9149/2024 · 2025-11-21
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199516 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199516 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9149 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 125 of 2024, under Sections 363, 366 I.P.C, P.S. Jagdishpur, District- Amethi. 3. The F.I.R in question has been lodged as a missing person report alleging that the informant was of firm that the daughter of the informant has been enticed away by the applicant. 4. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the victim has not yet been discovered and the applicant, having no criminal antecedents, is in custody since 25.05.2024 solely on the basis of apprehension. He has further draws attention towards the report of the Investigating Officer, wherein it is stated that all the efforts were made to trace out the victim, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail. 5. Learned A.G.A has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the material on record; the fact that the victim has not been recovered and the applicant has been implicated solely on the basis of apprehension expressed, the fact that the applicant is in jail since 25.05.2024, having no criminal antecedents, therefore, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant Narendra Nishad be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramakar Shukla, Brijesh Kumar Yadav, Lalit Kishore Tiwari, Shyam Bahadur Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Narendra Nishad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 21, 2025 DiVYa BAIL No. 9149 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench