Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19951 (KAR)

SMT. BHARATHI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/6917/2025 · 2025-07-03

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23952 WP No. 6917 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.6917 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. BHARATHI W/O LATE GOVINDARAJU AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.240, 5TH CROSS VALMIKI NAGARA BENGALURU-560052. 2. SRI. MANJUNATH S/O KARAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.162 KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD, NEAR MADURAMMA TEMPLE VAJARAHALLI TALAGHATTAPURA BENGALURU -560062. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SANDESH KUMAR M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23952 WP No. 6917 of 2025 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT K G ROAD BENGALURU-560001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK BENGALURU-560020. 4. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE HUDSON CIRCLE BENGALURU-560001. 5. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR RAJIV GANDHI HOUSING CORPORATION LTD CAUVERY BHAVAN, K G ROAD BENGALURU-560001. 6. THE TAHSILDAR BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK KANDAYA BHAVAN BENGALURU-560001. 7. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR SUB DIVISION BENGALURU-560098. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABURAO, AGA FOR R1, R2 & R6; SMT. SUMANA BALIGA, ADVOCATE FOR R4, R5 & R7; SRI. MURUGESH V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R3) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23952 WP No. 6917 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 09.02.2022 VIDE ANNX-A TO A11 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONERS TO THE RESPONDENTS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioners is with regard to non-consideration of the representations dated 09.02.2022 produced at Annexure-A to A11 by the respondent-authorities. 3. Sri. Siddarth Baburao, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent- State submits that similar representations are made and same are considered. Accordingly, sought for dismissal of the writ petition. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23952 WP No. 6917 of 2025 4. Be that as it may. The respondent- authorities herein are directed to consider the representations dated 09.02.2022 at Annexure-A to A11 in accordance with law within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. In view of disposal of main petition, pending applications if any, do not survive for consideration. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18