1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. 927 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6416 OF 2024 IN FA/3865/2019 Maruti @ Sambha Krushna Karke Versus The State of Maharashtra Thr Collector, Osmanabad and Ors ….. AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6431 OF 2024 IN FA/3862/2019 Ramling Ganpati Katgave Versus The State of Maharashtra Thr Collector, Osmanabad and Ors ….. AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6430 OF 2024 IN FA/3864/2019 Baburao Shrimant Karke Versus The State of Maharashtra Thr Collector, Osmanabad and Ors ….. AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6429 OF 2024 IN FA/3866/2019 Manik Dyanoba Katgave Versus The State of Maharashtra Thr Collector, Osmanabad and Ors ….. AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6387 OF 2024 IN FA/3863/2019 Vitthal Shivram Jawalge (Died) Thr. LRs Dhondabai V. Jawalge and Ors Versus The State of Maharashtra 2025:BHC-AUG:9379 2 Thr Collector, Osmanabad and Ors ….. AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6428 OF 2024 IN FA/3868/2019 Sunil Ramling Katgave Versus The State of Maharashtra Thr Collector, Osmanabad and Ors ….. Mr. Laxmikant C. Patil, Advocate for the Applicants in all the Applications Shri. D. J. Patil, AGP for the Respondent / State in all the Applications Shri. A. N. Gaddime, Advocate for Respondent No.3 in all the Applications. ….. CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. Dated : MARCH 27, 2025 PER COURT :- . These are the Applications for withdrawal of remaining 25% amount deposited by the Acquiring Body with the Office of this Court. 2. It is submitted by the learned Advocate for the Applicants that the Acquiring Body had deposited entire amount awarded by the learned Reference Court and the Applicants in the respective Applications have withdrawn total 75% amount from the said amount deposited by the Acquiring Body. He submits that 25% amount remains with this Court and the Applicants are ready to furnish solvent surety/security against withdrawal of the said remaining amount. He submits that this Court in similar matters i.e. in group of Civil Application No.6170 of 2024 in First 3 Appeal No.2657 of 2019 and other Applications has allowed the same request. 3. The Applications are opposed by the learned Advocate for the Acquiring Body. He submits that the Applicants have already withdrawn 75% of the amount and if the Applications are allowed, nothing would survive in the Appeals. He submits that the Applications be rejected. 4. The learned AGP opposes the Applications. 5. There is no dispute that by order dated 27.09.2024 passed in the aforesaid Civil Applications, this Court had considered and granted similar prayer. The Applicants herein are ready to furnish solvent surety/security towards withdrawal of the remaining 25% amount along with interest accrued thereon. 6. In view of the above, there is no impediment to allow the Applications and the same are allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘ B’ therein, subject to furnishing solvent surety/security by the Applicants against the said withdrawal to the satisfaction of Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. Civil Applications stand disposed off accordingly. ( NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. ) GGP