ABHISHEK SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND ANOTHER
A227/7252/2025 · 2025-12-17
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199477 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199477 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7252 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.2- Naib Tehsildar, Nagar, Tehsil Sadar, District Faizabad/Ayodhya to decide recall application No.1213 of 2023 "Abhishek Singh Vs. Lalji Singh", expeditiously.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case aforesaid case is decided in a time bound manner.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.2- Naib Tehsildar, Nagar, Tehsil Sadar, District Faizabad/Ayodhya is directed to decide recall application No.1213 of 2023 "Abhishek Singh Vs. Lalji Singh", expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 17, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avinash Mishra, Sanjay Kumar Singh, Saurabh Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Abhishek Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench