- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:17055 WP No. 6935 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 6935 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: ARUN KUMAR S/O LATE SURENDRA NAIR AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.3-1-119G NEAR SP OFFICE, BANNANJE, UDUPI-576103. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR M.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY 2. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING 2ND FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 3. KARNATAKA STATE BUILDING CENTER CAUVERY BHAVAN, 9TH FLOOR, C AND F BLOCK, K G ROAD, BENGALURU-560009 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER REGISTERED UNDER KSR ACT, 1960 4. UDUPI NIRMITHI KENDRA ALN LAYOUT, 4TH CROSS, ANANTHANAGARA, MANIPAL, UDUPI DISTRICT-576104 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:17055 WP No. 6935 of 2025 REGISTERED UNDER KARNATAKA SOCIETIES ACT, 1960 5. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAJATADRI, MANIPAL, UDUPI DISTRICT-567104 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHIVAPRABHU S. HIREMATH, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1, 2 AND 5; SMT. SUMANA BALIGA M., ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.3; SRI. VISHWAS GOWDA G.M., ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SUSPENSION ORDER BEARING NO.MAG(2)/CR/342/2023 E-120361, DATED 24.07.2024 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-B ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.5 AS ILLEGAL OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DECLARE THAT THE SUSPENSION ORDER BEARING NO.MAG(2)/CR/342/2023 E-120361, DATED 24.07.2024 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-B ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.5 TO BE REVOKED DUE TO LAPSE OF TIME. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the writ petition has become infructuous, in view of - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:17055 WP No. 6935 of 2025 the revocation of suspension order which is challenged in this writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record and the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52