HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7253 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while notice on behalf of respondent No.4 has been accepted by Sri Mohan Singh. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondent is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.2 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide revision No.7 of 2022 under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code in computerized case No.C 202204000000007 titled as Keshav Prasad Singh and another Vs. Ram Ajore and others, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case aforesaid case is decided in a time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No.2 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide revision No.7 of 2022 under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code in computerized case No.C 202204000000007 titled as Keshav Prasad Singh and another Vs. Ram Ajore and others, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 17, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Kushal Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Keshav Prasad Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench